Munson v. State of California

Filing 62

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 05/07/13 ( Final Pretrial Conference set for 7/3/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan.) The parties shall file a joint pretrial statement not later than 14 days prior to the pretrial conference. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KENNETH MUNSON, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 No. 2:09-cv-0478 JAM EFB P vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDER DIRECTING THE FILING OF PRETRIAL STATEMENTS AND SETTING FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE Defendant. / 15 16 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding with counsel in an action brought under the 17 Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act. A final pretrial conference is set 18 before the undersigned on July 3, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 8. Counsel are cautioned 19 that counsel appearing for pretrial will in fact try the matter. Counsel for all parties are to be 20 fully prepared for trial at the time of the pretrial conference, with no matters remaining to be 21 accomplished except production of witnesses for oral testimony. Counsel are referred to Local 22 Rules 281 and 282 relating to pretrial statements and conferences. A FAILURE TO COMPLY 23 WITH LOCAL RULES 281 AND 282 WILL BE GROUNDS FOR SANCTIONS. 24 The parties shall file a joint pretrial statement not later than fourteen days prior to the 25 pretrial conference. The joint pretrial statement shall conform with the requirements of Local 26 Rule 281(b). Where the parties are unable to agree as to what factual issues are properly before 1 1 the court for trial, they should nevertheless list in the section on “DISPUTED FACTUAL 2 ISSUES” all issues asserted by any of the parties and explain by parenthetical the controversy 3 concerning each issue. The parties should keep in mind that, in general, each fact should relate 4 or correspond to an element of the relevant cause of action. The parties should also keep in mind 5 that the purpose of listing the disputed factual issues is to apprise the court and all parties about 6 the precise issues that will be litigated at trial. The court is not interested in a listing of all 7 evidentiary facts underlying the issues that are in dispute. 8 Pursuant to Local Rule 281(b), the parties are required to provide in their pretrial 9 statement a list of witnesses and exhibits that they propose to proffer at trial, no matter for what 10 purpose. These lists shall not be contained in the pretrial statement itself, but shall be attached as 11 separate documents to be used as addenda to the final pretrial order. Plaintiff’s exhibits shall be 12 listed numerically; defendant’s exhibits shall be listed alphabetically. 13 Counsel are reminded that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16, it will be their 14 duty at the pretrial conference to aid the court in (a) formulation and simplification of issues and 15 the elimination of meritless claims or defenses; (b) settling of facts which should be properly 16 admitted; and (c) avoidance of unnecessary proof and cumulative evidence. The parties must 17 prepare their joint pretrial statement, and participate in good faith at the pretrial conference, with 18 these aims in mind. A FAILURE TO DO SO MAY RESULT IN THE IMPOSITION OF 19 SANCTIONS which may include monetary sanctions, orders precluding proof, eliminations of 20 claims or defenses, or such other sanctions as the court deems appropriate. 21 22 So ordered. DATED: May 7, 2013. 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?