Walnut Hill Estate Enterprises, LLC et al v. County of Butte et al

Filing 23

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 2/22/2010 GRANTING 22 Stipulation and Proposed Order; 17 Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing set for 3/22/2010 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr.. (Matson, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 FREAR STEPHEN SCHMID, CSB NO. 96089 ATTORNEY AT LAW 177 POST STREET, SUITE 890 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108 TELEPHONE: (415) 788-5957 FACSIMILE: (415) 788-5958 Attorneys for Plaintiffs WALNUT HILL ESTATE ENTERPRISES, LLC, JONOTHAN BENEFIELD, AND JULIE BENEFIELD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA W ALNUT HILL ESTATE ENTERPRISES, LLC, JONOTHAN BENEFIELD, AND JULIE BENEFIELD, Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF BUTTE, CITY OF OROVILLE, DAVID GOYER, BECKY FRASER, RAY SANDOVAL, CHRIS GAIL, AND DEREK PRESTESATER, Defendants. No. 2:09-CV-00500 GEB-GGH STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING DATE 18 ________________________________/ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The parties, through their respective counsel of record, stipulate continue the hearing date for summary judgment and/or an alternative partial summary judgment from its currently scheduled date of March 8, 2010, at 9:00 AM, to March 22, 2010, at 9:00 AM. The parties stipulate the opposition will be due 14 days before March 22, 2010 and the reply will be due 7 days before March 22, 2010. Plaintiffs' basis for this continuance request is that plaintiffs' counsel is not in a position to file an opposition to the motion that would be in conformance with the local rules, and fully set forth plaintiffs' arguments. Due to the press of business, plaintiffs' counsel, a sole practitioner, simply does not have adequate time to completely and fairly present the 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING DATE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 plaintiff's opposition under the current time limits. Accordingly, defense counsel has courteously stipulated to the continuance to March 22, 2010. Both counsel have looked at the pre-trial order and are of the opinion that this brief continuance will have no effect on further requirements as set forth in the pre-trial order. DATED: February 18, 2010 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Frear Stephen Schmid Frear Stephen Schmid, Attorney for Plaintiffs WALNUT HILL ESTATE ENTERPRISES, LLC, JONOTHAN BENEFIELD, AND JULIE BENEFIELD DATED: February 18, 2010 LAW OFFICE OF DOUGLAS R. THORN /s/ Douglas R. Thorn Douglas R. Thorn, Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF BUTTE, CITY OF OROVILLE, DAVID GOYER, BECKY FRASER, RAY SANDOVAL, CHRIS GAIL, AND DEREK PRESTESATER ORDER Since the parties have agreed to a continuance, defendants' motion for partial summary judgment and/or summary judgment in the alternative, is hereby continued from March 8, 2010 to March 22, 2010, at 9:00 AM, in Courtroom 10, with the parties to serve their respective briefs, with the opposition brief due on or before March 8, 2010 and the reply brief due on or before March 15, 2010. The pretrial conference is rescheduled for June 7, 2010, at 11:00 a.m. A joint pretrial statement is to be filed seven days prior to the hearing. Dated: February 22, 2010 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING DATE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?