Armentero v. Knowles et al

Filing 38

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/3/2010 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A); the court notes that pltf's request for counsel and the 35 findings and recommendations are moot. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
1/kly arme0503.dis

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LUIS LORENZO ARMENTERO, Plaintiff, vs. MIKE KNOWLES, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff seeks dismissal of this action under Rule 41(a)(1)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Because plaintiff has provided the court with the notice required under that rule, and because defendants have not yet filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment, this action is DISMISSED. The court notes that plaintiff also has filed a request for appointment of counsel. His request for dismissal is unequivocal, however, making the request for counsel moot. The findings and recommendations filed on October 19 also are moot. DATED: November 3, 2010. ORDER No. CIV S-09-0503 JAM KJM P