Dixon v. Yates
Filing
29
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/3/09 ORDERING that the amended petition 27 shall be placed in the courts file and disregarded.(Dillon, M)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1
1 dixo0513.ama(2)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CLARENCE HENRY DIXON, Petitioner, vs. JAMES A. YATES, et al., Respondents. / Petitioner has filed a document which appears to be an amended petition for writ of habeas corpus. Respondent has answered the original petition, and petitioner has not been granted leave to file an amended petition. Therefore, the amended petition (#27) shall be placed in the court's file and disregarded. DATED: December 3, 2009. ORDER No. CIV S-09-0513 GEB KJM P
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
