Gabrielson et al v. United States Postal Service et al

Filing 44

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/27/2011 VACATING the Settlement Conference scheduled for 11/1/2011 as to Pltf. Troy Gabrielson only. (Michel, G)

Download PDF
1 R i v era & A s s o ci a t es 2 2180 H arvard Street, Ste. 310 Sacram ento, C alifornia 95815 3 4 5 6 7 Te l: 9 1 6 -9 2 2 -1 2 0 0 F a x : 9 1 6 9 2 2 -1 3 0 3 J es s e M . R i vera, C S N 84259 J o nat han B. P aul , C S N 215884 S hanan L. Hewi t t , C S N 200168 Kel l y A. Yokl ey, C S N 192015 Attorneys for Plaintiff TROY GABRIELSON 8 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 TROY GABRIELSON, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) ) UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, et ) al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) CASE NO. 2:09-CV-00538-MCE-GGH STIPULATION AND ORDER TO VACATE THE NOVEMBER 1, 2011 SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE BEFORE MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENDALL J. NEWMAN AS TO PLAINTIFF TROY GABRIELSON 18 19 COMES NOW the plaintiff, TROY GABRIELSON, by and through his attorney 20 Jonathan B. Paul, of Rivera & Associates and defendant UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 21 by and through its attorney Jason Ehrlinspiel, of the U.S. Attorney’s Office and subject to the 22 approval of this Court, hereby agree to and respectfully request the vacation of the November 1, 23 2011 settlement conference set before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. The undersigned 24 have agreed to purpose vacation of this conference and contend there is good cause for this 25 request for the following reasons: 26 1) At the invitation of and in response to a prior settlement offer by the United States, 27 Plaintiff Troy Gabrielson presented a settlement demand prior to the rescheduling of the 28 settlement conference in this matter to November 1, 2011. Plaintiff’s 1.5 million dollar 1 2 settlement offer is six times the sum certain listed in his FTCA administrative claim. 2) That Plaintiff Gabrielson’s demand was rejected by the Untied States. The United States 3 asserts that plaintiff Gabrielson is administratively capped in his recovery pursuant to a 4 Government tort claim filed in this action. The United States also contests liability and 5 plaintiff Gabrielson’s alleged damages. 6 3) The parties have had further discussions on the topic of presenting their respective 7 positions to the Magistrate Judge at the settlement conference. However, the parties 8 remain steadfast in their respective positions regarding liability, the administrative cap 9 and plaintiff Gabrielson’s alleged damages; hence the parties are diametrically opposed 10 11 on the settlement value of this Mr. Gabrielson’s case. 4) In light of the foregoing, the parties herein do not believe that continuing forward with 12 the settlement conference as to plaintiff, TROY GABRIELSON would be productive for 13 either the parties nor a sensible expenditure of judicial resources in this case. 14 5) 15 16 Hence, the parties agree that this matter is no longer amenable to settlement conference as to plaintiff, TROY GABRIELSON’s claims. 6) The parties herein are in no way indicating that the November 1, 2011 settlement 17 conference should not continue as to Plaintiff, ALLAN BOWEN. 18 RIVERA & ASSOCIATES 19 DATED: October 27, 2011 20 /s/ Jonathan B. Paul JONATHAN B. PAUL Attorney for Plaintiff Troy Gabrielson 21 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE 22 DATED: October 27, 2011 23 24 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// /s/ Jason Ehrlinspiel (auth’d on October 27, 2011 ) Jason Ehrlinspiel, Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Defendant United States Postal Service 1 FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN as stated in the above set forth reasons, 2 IT IS SO ORDERED that the settlement conference scheduled for November 1, 2011 is 3 vacated as to Plaintiff TROY GABRIELSON, only. 4 DATED: October 27, 2011 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?