Grassi, et al v. Moody's Investors Services, et al
Filing
75
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/02/09 ORDERING that plf's 71 Motion (Request) to file a reply is DENIED. (Benson, A.)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
DAD:kw dad1/orders.pro se/grassi0543.ord.req2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RONALD M. GRASSI, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MOODY'S INVESTOR'S SERVICES, et al., / Plaintiffs were granted leave to file a supplemental brief in opposition to defendants' motions to dismiss, and the moving parties were granted leave to respond. Plaintiffs now seek leave to file a reply to a reply. The court declines to permit further briefing. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiffs' September 1, 2009 request (Doc. No. 71) for leave of court to file a reply to defendant McGraw-Hill's reply to plaintiff's supplemental briefing is denied. DATED: October 2, 2009. ORDER No. CIV S-09-0543 JAM DAD PS
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
