Grassi, et al v. Moody's Investors Services, et al
Filing
97
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/8/2010 DENYING pltf's 96 request to file a reply to dfts' reply. (Yin, K)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
DAD:kw dad1/orders.pro se/grassi0543.ord.req3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RONALD M. GRASSI, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MOODY'S INVESTOR'S SERVICES, et al., / Defendants have moved to dismiss plaintiffs' first amended complaint. With the filing of defendants' joint reply to plaintiffs' opposition, the motion is now fully briefed. Plaintiffs seek leave to file a reply to defendants' reply. The court finds the proposed additional briefing to be unnecessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiffs' June 7, 2010 request (Doc. No. 96) for leave to file a reply to defendants' reply is denied. DATED: June 8, 2010. ORDER No. CIV S-09-0543 JAM DAD PS
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
