Walker v. CA Dept of Corrections & Rehabilitation, et al

Filing 55

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 8/29/2014 AFFIRMING the 53 Order of the Magistrate Judge. (Michel, G)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

K. JAMEL WALKER,

11
12
13
14
15

No. 2:09-cv-0569 WBS KJN P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

On August 8, 2014, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s

18

order filed July 24, 2014, denying plaintiff’s July 9, 2014 motion to strike. Pursuant to E.D.

19

Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or

20

contrary to law.” Id. Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the

21

magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

22

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

23

magistrate judge (ECF No. 53), is affirmed.

24

Dated: August 29, 2014

25
26
27
28