Walker v. CA Dept of Corrections & Rehabilitation, et al
Filing
55
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 8/29/2014 AFFIRMING the 53 Order of the Magistrate Judge. (Michel, G)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
K. JAMEL WALKER,
11
12
13
14
15
No. 2:09-cv-0569 WBS KJN P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
On August 8, 2014, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s
18
order filed July 24, 2014, denying plaintiff’s July 9, 2014 motion to strike. Pursuant to E.D.
19
Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or
20
contrary to law.” Id. Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the
21
magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
22
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the
23
magistrate judge (ECF No. 53), is affirmed.
24
Dated: August 29, 2014
25
26
27
28
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?