Walker v. CA Dept of Corrections & Rehabilitation, et al

Filing 69

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/3/2015 ORDERING upon reconsidertation, the 10/30/2015 order is AFFIRMED. Plaintiff's 65 motion for reconsideration is DENIED. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

K. JAMEL WALKER,

11
12
13
14

No. 2:09-cv-0569 WBS KJN PS

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, et al.,
Defendants.

15
16
17

On November 12, 2015, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the magistrate

18

judge’s order, filed October 30, 2015, denying plaintiff’s motion for additional discovery.

19

Pursuant to Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly

20

erroneous or contrary to law.” (Id.) Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not

21

appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

22

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

23

1. Upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed October 30, 2015 is

24
25
26
27

affirmed.
2. Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 65) is denied.
Dated: December 3, 2015
/walk0569.850

28
1