Lugo v. Walker et al
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 7/29/09 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED. CASE CLOSED(Dillon, M)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
/001; lugo0603.fsc
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RUSTY LUGO, Plaintiff, vs. WALKER, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff has consented to proceed before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). By order filed June 24, 2009, plaintiff was directed to show cause, in writing and within twenty days, why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice. Twenty days have now passed and plaintiff has failed to show cause or otherwise respond to this court's order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). DATED: July 29, 2009. ORDER No. 2:09-cv-0603 JFM (PC)
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
