Jones v. Swingle et al

Filing 55

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 3/21/2011 ADOPTING 53 Findings and Recommendations in full. Pltf's 26 , 29 , 30 , 39 , 42 , 43 , and 44 motions for a preliminary injunction are DENIED. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
-EFB (PC) Jones v. Swingle et al Doc. 55 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. D. SWINGLE, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 9, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MALIK JONES, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-0619 GEB EFB P ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 and 1. The findings and recommendations filed February 9, 2011, are adopted in full; 2. Plaintiff's motions for a preliminary injunction, Dckt. Nos. 26, 29, 30, 39, 42, 43, and 44, are denied. Dated: March 21, 2011 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?