Jones v. Swingle et al

Filing 97

ORDER (and Wyatt Notice) signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/4/2013 ORDERING that plaintiff's opposition to defendants' 95 motion to dismiss within 21 days, and that defendants' reply, if any, due within 14 days thereafter. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MALIK JONES, Plaintiff, 11 No. 2:09-cv-0619 GEB EFB P vs. 12 13 SWINGLE, et al., Defendants. 14 ORDER / 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 16 17 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 28, 2013, defendants filed a motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust 18 administrative remedies. Dckt. No. 95. Defendants’ motion did not include a notice to plaintiff 19 informing him of the requirements for opposing a motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust 20 available administrative remedies. See Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012); Stratton v. 21 Buck, 697 F.3d 1004, 1008 (9th Cir. 2012); Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1115, 1120 n.15 22 (9th Cir. 2003). Accordingly, the court hereby provides plaintiff with the requisite notice in the 23 attached “Wyatt Notice.” 24 //// 25 //// 26 //// 1 1 As plaintiff has now received the notice required by Woods, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 2 that plaintiff’s opposition to defendants’ motion to dismiss is due within 21 days of the date of 3 this order, and that defendants’ reply, if any, is due within fourteen days thereafter. 4 DATED: April 4, 2013. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 Wyatt Notice to Plaintiff 2 This notice is provided to ensure that you, a pro se prisoner plaintiff, “have fair, timely 3 and adequate notice of what is required” to oppose a motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust 4 administrative remedies. See Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012); Wyatt v. Terhune, 5 315 F.3d 1108, 1115, 1120 n.15 (9th Cir. 2003). The court requires that you be provided with 6 this notice regarding the requirements for opposing a motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust 7 administrative remedies. 8 When a defendant moves to dismiss some or all of your claims for failure to exhaust 9 administrative remedies, the defendant is requesting that the court dismiss claims for which you 10 did not exhaust available administrative remedies. A “motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust 11 administrative remedies is similar to a motion for a summary judgment in that the district court 12 will consider materials beyond the pleadings.” Stratton v. Buck, 697 F.3d 1004, 1008 (9th Cir. 13 2012). The defendant may submit affidavits or declarations under penalty of perjury and 14 admissible documents in support of the motion. To oppose the motion, you must submit proof of specific facts regarding the exhaustion 15 16 of administrative remedies. To do this, you may refer to specific statements made in your 17 complaint if you signed your complaint under penalty of perjury and if your complaint shows 18 that you have personal knowledge of the matters stated. You may also submit declarations 19 setting forth facts regarding exhaustion of your claims, as long as the person who signs the 20 declaration has personal knowledge of the facts stated. You may also submit all or part of 21 deposition transcripts, answers to interrogatories, admissions, and other authenticated 22 documents. If you fail to contradict the defendant’s evidence with your own evidence, the court 23 may accept the defendant’s evidence as the truth and grant the motion. If you do not respond to 24 the motion, the court may consider your failure to act as a waiver of your opposition. See L.R. 25 230(l). 26 //// 3 1 If the court grants the defendant’s motion, whether opposed or unopposed, your 2 unexhausted claims will be dismissed. If all of your claims are unexhausted, your entire case 3 will be over. If, however, you exhaust administrative remedies for your claims at a later date, 4 you may raise those claims in a new action. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?