Jones v. Swingle et al
Filing
98
ORDER ADOPTING 94 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 4/9/13. Defendant Burgett is DISMISSED without prejudice. (Manzer, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
MALIK JONES,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
No. 2:09-cv-0619 GEB EFB P
vs.
D. SWINGLE, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
ORDER
/
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action
17
seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
18
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
19
On March 7, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations
20
herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any
21
objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days from the
22
date the findings and recommendations were served. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings
23
and recommendations.
24
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule
25
304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire
26
////
1
1
file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by
2
proper analysis.
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
1. The findings and recommendations filed March 7, 2013, are adopted in full;
5
6
7
8
and
2. Defendant Burgett is dismissed without prejudice.
So ordered.
Dated: April 9, 2013
9
10
11
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
Senior United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?