Bun v. Felker et al

Filing 98

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 5/7/13 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations filed 3/26/13, are adopted in full; Defendants' 8/3/12 motion for summary judgment is granted as to defendants Brown, Marsh, Watkins, and Felker ; and this action proceeds only on plaintiff's requests for damages and injunctive relief based on the following claims: an Eighth Amendment claim against defendants Perry, Hook, Lower, Handshumacker, and Ramsey based on the escort in freezing temperatures with restraints andminimal clothing; an Eighth Amendment claim against defendants Sanchez and Essman based on the denial of food from 11/25/06 to 11/28/06; an Eighth Amendment claim against defendant Kirkland based on the rough treatment of plaintiff in the holding cell; an Eighth Amendment claims against defendants Kirkland, Kissinger, Sanchez, Garate, and Aurich based on their tampering with/denial of food, and frequent cell searches, resulting in the flooding of plaintiff's cell and bedding and the confiscation or destruction of his toiletries; and a First Amendment retaliation claim against defendants Kirkland,Kissinger, Sanchez, Garate, and Aurich based on their destruction of plaintiff's personal property, mail, and inmate appeals because plaintiff filed, or attempted to file, administrative appeals. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHANTHON BUN, Plaintiff, 11 12 vs. 13 No. 2:09-cv-0631 LKK EFB P T. FELKER, et al., Defendants. 14 ORDER / 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 16 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 26, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 19 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither 22 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 23 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 ///// 1 1 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 26, 2013, are adopted in full; 2 2. Defendants’ August 3, 2012 motion for summary judgment is granted as to 3 defendants Brown, Marsh, Watkins, and Felker; and 4 5 3. This action proceeds only on plaintiff’s requests for damages and injunctive relief based on the following claims: 6 a. an Eighth Amendment claim against defendants Perry, Hook, Lower, 7 Handshumacker, and Ramsey based on the escort in freezing temperatures with restraints and 8 minimal clothing; 9 10 b. an Eighth Amendment claim against defendants Sanchez and Essman based on the denial of food from November 25, 2006 to November 28, 2006; 11 12 c. an Eighth Amendment claim against defendant Kirkland based on the rough treatment of plaintiff in the holding cell; 13 d. an Eighth Amendment claims against defendants Kirkland, Kissinger, 14 Sanchez, Garate, and Aurich based on their tampering with/denial of food, and frequent cell 15 searches, resulting in the flooding of plaintiff’s cell and bedding and the confiscation or 16 destruction of his toiletries; and 17 e. a First Amendment retaliation claim against defendants Kirkland, 18 Kissinger, Sanchez, Garate, and Aurich based on their destruction of plaintiff’s personal 19 property, mail, and inmate appeals because plaintiff filed, or attempted to file, administrative 20 appeals. 21 DATED: May 7, 2013. 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?