Turner v. Dickinson et al

Filing 31

ORDER ADOPTING 29 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, in full, signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 9/5/2011. Defendants' 19 Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint is DENIED. Within 30 days from service of Order, defendant Rohrer is ordered to file his Answer. (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NATHAN KEVIN TURNER, 11 12 13 14 Plaintiff, vs. KATHLINE DICKINSON, et al., Defendants. 15 16 No. CIV S-09-0632 GEB DAD P ORDER / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On July 19, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 21 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Defendant Rohrer 22 has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 24 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the 25 entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 26 proper analysis. 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 19, 2011 are adopted in full; 3 2. Defendant’s January 14, 2011 motion to dismiss the amended complaint for 4 5 failure to exhaust administrative remedies (Doc. No. 19) is denied; and 3. Within thirty days from the service of this order, defendant Rohrer is ordered 6 to file his answer. 7 Dated: September 5, 2011 8 9 10 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?