Rider et al v. Parente et al

Filing 34

ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/21/11 ORDERING 22 Motion for Reconsideration is denied; and the order of the magistrate judge filed 12/22/10 is affirmed. (Matson, R)

-DAD (PC) Rider et al v. Parente et al

Doc. 34

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. PARENTE, et al., Defendants. / On January 3, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed December 22, 2010, granting defendants an extension of time to file a responsive pleading. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. /// /// /// /// /// 1
Dockets.Justia.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CHRISTOPHER S. RIDER, Plaintiff, No. 2:09-cv-00637 MCE DAD P

ORDER

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 and

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's January 3, 2011, motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 22) is denied;

2. The order of the magistrate judge filed December 22, 2010, is affirmed. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 21, 2011 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2