Francis v. Cate, et al.

Filing 41

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/7/2010 ORDERING that w/in 14 days, dfts Pomazal and Riker shall pay the USM the sum of $175.13 each, unless w/in that time, each dft files a written statement showing good causse for his failure to waive service; the clerk to serve a copy of this order on the USM. (cc: USM) (Yin, K)

(PC) Francis v. Cate, et al.

Doc. 41

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. MATTHEW CATE, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel and in forma pauperis in this action seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 6, 2009, the court ordered the United States Marshal to serve process upon the defendants in this case. The Marshal was directed to attempt to secure a waiver of service before attempting personal service on defendants. If a waiver of service was not returned by a defendant within sixty days, the Marshal was directed to effect personal service on that defendant in accordance with the provisions of Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 28 U.S.C. § 566(c), without prepayment of costs, and to file the return of service with evidence of any attempt to secure a waiver of service and with evidence of all costs subsequently incurred in effecting personal service. //// 1
Dockets.Justia.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JOHN FRANCIS, Plaintiff, No. 2:09-cv-0640 JAM KJN P

ORDER

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 follows:

On December 8, 2009, the United States Marshal filed a return of service with a USM-285 form showing total charges of $350.26 for effecting personal service on defendants A. Pomazal, D.O., and Jeremy Riker, P.A. on November 25, 2009. The form shows that a waiver of service form was mailed to these defendants on August 12, 2009, and that no response was received. Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides, in pertinent part, as

An individual, corporation, or association that is subject to service under subdivision (e), (f), or (h) and that receives notice of an action in the manner provided in this paragraph has a duty to avoid unnecessary costs of serving the summons . . . . If a defendant located within the United States fails to comply with a request for waiver made by a plaintiff located within the United States, the court shall impose the costs subsequently incurred in effecting service on the defendant unless good cause for the failure be shown. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(2). The court finds that defendants A. Pomazal, D.O., and Jeremy Riker, P.A. were given the opportunity required by Rule 4(d)(2) to waive service and has failed to comply with the request. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Within fourteen days from the date of this order defendants A. Pomazal, D.O., and Jeremy Riker, P.A., shall pay to the United States Marshal the sum of $175.13 each, unless within that time each defendant files a written statement showing good cause for his failure to waive service. The court does not intend to extend this fourteen day period. //// //// //// ////

2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
fran0640.tax

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the U.S. Marshal. DATED: July 7, 2010

_____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

3