Walker v. Whitten et al
Filing
106
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 09/13/12 ordering within 14 days, the Warden at plaintiff's incarceration inform the court whether plaintiff has access to legal documents filed in this case. If plaintiff does not have access to those documents, the Warden shall explain why not. The clerk of the court is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the Warden of California State Prison, Lancaster. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
JEFFREY E. WALKER,
11
12
13
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
No. 2:09-cv-0642 WBS CKD P
vs.
A.H. WHITTEN, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
/
Plaintiff is a California prisoner proceeding pro se with an action for violation of
17
civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is pending.
18
Plaintiff filed an opposition to the motion on January 20, 2012. Following the Ninth Circuit’s
19
decision in Woods v. Carey, No. 09-15548 (9th Cir. July 6, 2012), the court provided plaintiff
20
with the notice required by that decision and granted plaintiff until September 6, 2012 to file an
21
amended opposition. Plaintiff has informed the court that he cannot determine whether to amend
22
his opposition because he is being denied access to documents filed in this action.
23
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
24
1. Within fourteen days, the Warden at plaintiff’s place of incarceration inform
25
the court whether plaintiff has access to legal documents filed in this case. If plaintiff does not
26
have access to those documents, the Warden shall explain why not.
1
1
2
2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the
Warden of California State Prison, Lancaster.
3
Dated: September 13, 2012
4
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
8
1
walk0642.war
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?