Walker v. Whitten et al
Filing
113
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/01/12 ordering plaintiff's request for an extension of time 112 is granted. Plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of this order to file an amended opposition to defendants' p ending motion for summary judgment. If plaintiff elects not to file an amended opposition by that date, defendants' motion for summary judgment will stand submitted to the court for decision. Absent extraordinary cause, no further extensions o f time will be granted. Any reply to plaintiff's opposition shall be due no later than 14 days after service of the amended opposition. The motions filed by plaintiff on 08/27/12 105 ; 09/14/12 107 and 10/09/12 110 are denied as moot. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
JEFFREY E. WALKER,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
No. 2:09-cv-0642 WBS CKD P
vs.
A.H. WHITTEN, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
ORDER
/
16
Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file an amended opposition to
17
defendants’ pending motion for summary judgment. Good cause appearing, that request will be
18
granted. Also, the court notes that plaintiff has three motions pending concerning conditions of
19
confinement at California State Prison, Lancaster. Since plaintiff has been transferred to the
20
California Men’s Colony in San Luis Obispo, those motions will be denied as moot.
21
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
22
1. Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time (Dkt. No. 112) is granted;
23
2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order to file an amended
24
opposition to defendants’ pending motion for summary judgment. If plaintiff elects not to file an
25
amended opposition by that date, defendants’ motion for summary judgment will stand submitted
26
/////
1
1
to the court for decision. Absent extraordinary cause, no further extensions of time will be
2
granted.
3
4
3. Any reply to plaintiff’s amended opposition shall be due no later than 14 days
after service of the amended opposition.
5
6
4. The motions filed by plaintiff on August 27, 2012 (Dkt. No. 105); September
14, 2012 (Dkt. No. 107) and October 9, 2012 (Dkt. No. 110) are denied as moot.
7
Dated: November 1, 2012
8
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
1
walk0642.ext(2)
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?