Walker v. Whitten et al
Filing
61
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/27/2011 DENYING plaintiff's 57 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. (Marciel, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
JEFFREY E. WALKER,
Plaintiff,
11
vs.
12
13
No. CIV S-09-0642 WBS GGH (TEMP) P
A.H. WHITTEN, et al.,
Defendants.
14
ORDER
/
15
Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme
16
17
Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent
18
prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In
19
certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel
20
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991);
21
Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court
22
does not find the required exceptional circumstances. The issues are not complicated factually
23
speaking, nor is the law unusually complicated. Plaintiff has shown sufficient ability to articulate
24
his claims. Plaintiff’s request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.
25
/////
26
/////
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s request for the
1
2
appointment of counsel (Docket No. 57) is denied.
3
DATED: July 27, 2011
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
4
5
GGH:md
6
walk0642.31
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?