Walker v. Whitten et al

Filing 61

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/27/2011 DENYING plaintiff's 57 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEFFREY E. WALKER, Plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 13 No. CIV S-09-0642 WBS GGH (TEMP) P A.H. WHITTEN, et al., Defendants. 14 ORDER / 15 Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme 16 17 Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent 18 prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In 19 certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel 20 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); 21 Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court 22 does not find the required exceptional circumstances. The issues are not complicated factually 23 speaking, nor is the law unusually complicated. Plaintiff has shown sufficient ability to articulate 24 his claims. Plaintiff’s request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied. 25 ///// 26 ///// 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s request for the 1 2 appointment of counsel (Docket No. 57) is denied. 3 DATED: July 27, 2011 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 4 5 GGH:md 6 walk0642.31 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?