Walker v. Whitten et al

Filing 88

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/30/11 denying 86 Motion for an order directing officials at his prison to provide him with access to a typewriter. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEFFREY E. WALKER, 11 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-0642 WBS CKD P vs. A. H. WHITTEN, et al., Defendants. ORDER / Plaintiff is a California prisoner proceeding pro se. On December 22, 2011, 17 plaintiff filed a motion in which he requests that the court enter an order directing staff at 18 plaintiff’s prison to provide plaintiff with access to a typewriter. Plaintiff asserts he experiences 19 pain on one of his hands when he writes for long periods of time. 20 The court notes that plaintiff has filed seven documents over the last two months. 21 While this does not necessarily demonstrate that plaintiff does not have difficulty writing, it does 22 demonstrate he is capable of doing so. The court notes that the only document plaintiff need 23 prepare at this point in this case (considering discovery is closed and the deadline for filing 24 pretrial motions has passed) is his opposition to defendants’ pending motion for summary 25 judgment. It appears plaintiff is capable of doing this without a typewriter. Plaintiff is certainly 26 free to seek an extension of time based upon his physical limitations if that is necessary. 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s December 22, 2011 2 motion for an order directing officials at his prison to provide him with access to a typewriter 3 (Dkt. No. 86) is denied. 4 Dated: December 30, 2011 5 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 1 walk0642.tw (2) 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?