Schmidt, et al v. United States of America, et al

Filing 107

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 6/3/2013 ORDERING the subpoena issued to Harford Fire Insurance Company on 5/12/2013, will NOT BE ENFORCED; and 106 objections, filed 5/28/2013 by Harford, construed as a Motion to Quash, is DENIED as MOOT; Clerk shall serve Hartford Fire Insurance Company by e-mail and at the address indicated in docket #106. (Waggoner, D)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LONNIE G. SCHMIDT, et al., 11 Plaintiffs, 12 No. 2:09-cv-0660 LKK GGH PS vs. 13 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Pending before the court is a letter objection regarding a subpoena to non-party 17 Hartford Fire Insurance Company (“Hartford”), filed by Hartford’s counsel. According to 18 Hartford, it received the subpoena on May 12, 2013. The discovery cutoff in this case was April 19 24, 2013. (Dkt. no. 80.) As the undersigned stated in priors order with respect to previous 20 subpoenas issued by plaintiffs, plaintiffs should have requested an extension to the discovery 21 cutoff prior to the April 24th deadline if they had a reasonable excuse for waiting so long to issue 22 the subpoenas. See Dkt. nos. 96, 105. 23 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 24 1. The subpoena issued to Hartford Fire Insurance Company on May 12, 2013, 25 will not be enforced; and 26 ///// 1 1 2 3 2. Objections, filed May 28, 2013 by Hartford, (dkt. no. 106), construed as a motion to quash, is denied as moot. 3. The Clerk shall serve Hartford Fire Insurance Company by e-mail and at the 4 address indicated in docket number 106. 5 DATED: June 3, 2013 6 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 GGH:076/Schmidt0660.subp3.wpd 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?