Kirk v. DVI - R/C

Filing 33

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 05/10/11 ordering that a response to the 3rd amended petition 30 shall be filed within 30 days of the date of this order. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LARRY W. KIRK, 12 No. CIV S-09-0668-CMK-P Petitioner, 13 vs. 14 S.M. SALINAS, 15 ORDER Respondent. 16 / 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of 18 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pursuant to the written consent of all parties, this 19 case is before the undersigned as the presiding judge for all purposes, including entry of final 20 judgment. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Pending before the court is petitioner’s third amended 21 petition (Doc. 30). 22 Following the dismissal of plaintiff’s second amended petition as a mixed 23 petition, petitioner was provided an opportunity to file a third amended petition, which he has 24 now done. Respondent, however, has not filed a response to the third amended petition. 25 /// 26 /// 1 1 To the extent respondent was waiting for a court ordered deadline to file a 2 response, the court now orders that a response to the third amended petition (Doc. 30) shall be 3 filed within 30 days of the date of this order.1 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 DATED: May 10, 2011 7 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1 26 Given the amount of time that has passed since the third amended petition was filed, the court will not look favorably upon any motion for additional time to file the response. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?