Canam Steel Corporation v. Mayo, et al.,

Filing 59

ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 11/5/09 re 58 Notice of Settlement and Proposed Order. It is ORDERED that all future calendar dates are vacated, including motion hearings re docket nos. 52 and 53 . Parties directed to file all dispositional papers on or before 12/11/09. (Owen, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 D A V ID M. GIVEN (State Bar No. 142375) F E A T H E R D. BARON (State Bar No. 252489) P H IL L IP S , ERLEWINE & GIVEN LLP 5 0 California Street, 35th Floor S a n Francisco, California 94111 T e le p h o n e : (415) 398-0900 F a c sim ile : (415) 398-0911 A tto rn e ys for Plaintiff U N I T E D STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 E A S T E R N DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT 23 P u r s u a n t to Local Rule 16-160(a), the undersigned, being counsel of record for the 24 re sp e c tiv e parties in this action, hereby notify the Court that the parties have reached a 25 b in d in g settlement in mediation of this action and are in the process of preparing 26 se ttle m e n t documentation. The undersigned therefore request that the Court vacate all 27 f u tu re calendar dates, which include Motions for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by both 28 p a rtie s (Docket Nos. 52 and 53) set for hearing on November 12, 2009. NTC. OF SETTLEMENT ­ Case No. 2:09-cv-00672-MCE-KJM C A N A M STEEL CORPORATION, a D e la w a re corporation, for itself and d e riv a tiv e ly for JD2, Inc., ) ) ) ) P l a in tif f , ) ) v. ) ) J O H N MAYO, an individual; CADELA ) S T E E L , INC., a California corporation; ) J D 2 , INC., a California corporation; and ) T H E SPECTRUS GROUP, INC., ) ) D e f e n d a n ts . ) ___________________________________ ) ) ) A N D RELATED CROSS-ACTON ) ___________________________________ ) C A S E NO. 2:09-cv-00672-MCE-KJM N O T IC E OF SETTLEMENT; ORDER A c tio n Filed: March 11, 2009 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 B y: 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 B y: /s/ Feather D. Baron, Attorneys for Plaintiff/CrossD e f en d a n t Canam Steel Corporation 2 D a te d : November __, 2009 P H IL L IP S , ERLEWINE & GIVEN LLP D A V I D M. GIVEN F E A T H E R D. BARON B y: /s/ Mark A. Serlin, Attorneys for Defendant/CrossC o m p la in a n t JD2, Inc. D a te d : November __, 2009 S E R L IN & WHITEFORD, LLP M A R K A. SERLIN /s/ Kenneth C. Mennemeier, Attorneys for Defendants J o h n Mayo, Cadela Steel, Inc., and The Spectrus G ro u p , Inc. P u rsu a n t to Local Rule 16-160(b), the undersigned further request that the Court e x te n d the time for filing dispositional papers in this action to December 11, 2009. The p a rtie s' settlement agreement provides for certain deadlines in early December 2009, and th e parties therefore seek extra time before filing dispositional documents to meet such d e a d lin e s. The undersigned stipulate and agree to notify the Court should those deadlines n o t be met on or before December 11, 2009. The undersigned further stipulate and agree th a t parties intend for the Court to retain jurisdiction to enforce the parties' settlement a g re e m e n t reflecting the settlement of this action. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: November__, 2009 M E N N E M E IE R , GLASSMAN & STROUD LLP K E N N E T H C. MENNEMEIER S T E P H E N LAU NTC. OF SETTLEMENT ­ Case No. 2:09-cv-00672-MCE-KJM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 5, 2009 ORDER P u rs u a n t to stipulation, and good cause having been shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT all future calendar dates are vacated, including th e Motions for Judgment on the Pleadings set for hearing on November 12, 2009 (D o c k e t Nos. 52 and 53). The parties are directed to file all dispositional papers in this a c tio n on or before December 11, 2009. ________________________________ M O R R IS O N C. ENGLAND, JR. U N IT E D STATES DISTRICT JUDGE NTC. OF SETTLEMENT ­ Case No. 2:09-cv-00672-MCE-KJM 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?