Canam Steel Corporation v. Mayo, et al.,

Filing 63

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/6/2010 GRANTING 62 Stipulation and Proposed Order; This action is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs, and that the Court shall retain post-dismissal jurisdiction to enforce the Settlement Agreement. Civil Case Terminated. CASE CLOSED. (Matson, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NICHOLAS A. CARLIN (State Bar No. 112532) DAVID M. GIVEN (State Bar No. 142375) FEATHER D. BARON (State Bar No. 252489) PHILLIPS, ERLEWINE & GIVEN LLP 50 California Street, 35th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 398-0900 Facsimile: (415) 398-0911 Attorneys for Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 50 California Street, 35th Flr. San Francisco, CA 94111 (415) 398-0900 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) JOHN MAYO, an individual; CADELA ) STEEL, INC., a California corporation; JD2, ) INC., a California corporation; and THE ) SPECTRUS GROUP, INC., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION _________________________________________________) CANAM STEEL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, for itself and derivatively for JD2, Inc., CASE NO. 2:09-cv-00672-MCE-KJM STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE Action Filed: March 11, 2009 PHILLIPS, ERLEWINE & GIVEN LLP STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff Canam Steel Corporation and defendants John Mayo, Cadela Steel, Inc., JD2, Inc. and The Spectrus Group, Inc. have reached a settlement of all claims and cross-claims in the above-captioned action, the terms of which are detailed in that certain Stipulation for Settlement (the "Settlement Agreement") dated October 30, 2009, Reference No. 1100059823. Accordingly, the undersigned, being counsel of record for the respective parties in this action, hereby request, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(2), that this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION -- CASE NO. 2:09-cv-00672-MCE-KJM 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Court enter a final order dismissing this action in its entirety and with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. The undersigned further request that the Court retain post-dismissal jurisdiction to enforce the Settlement Agreement. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: December_31_, 2009 MENNEMEIER, GLASSMAN & STROUD LLP KENNETH C. MENNEMEIER STEPHEN LAU By: _______/s/_________________________________ Kenneth C. Mennemeier, Attorneys for Defendants John Mayo, Cadela Steel, Inc., and The Spectrus Group, Inc. SERLIN & WHITEFORD, LLP MARK A. SERLIN By: _____/s/____________________________________ Mark A. Serlin, Attorneys for Defendant/CrossComplainant JD2, Inc. PHILLIPS, ERLEWINE & GIVEN LLP 50 California Street, 35th Flr. San Francisco, CA 94111 (415) 398-0900 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: December _29_, 2009 Dated: December _31_, 2009 PHILLIPS, ERLEWINE & GIVEN LLP DAVID M. GIVEN FEATHER D. BARON By: ______/s/____________________________________ David M. Given, Attorneys for Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant Canam Steel Corporation STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION -- CASE NO. 2:09-cv-00672-MCE-KJM 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ORDER Pursuant to stipulation, good cause having been shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the above-captioned action is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs, and that the Court shall retain post-dismissal jurisdiction to enforce the Settlement Agreement. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: January 6, 2010 __________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE PHILLIPS, ERLEWINE & GIVEN LLP 50 California Street, 35th Flr. San Francisco, CA 94111 (415) 398-0900 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION -- CASE NO. 2:09-cv-00672-MCE-KJM 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?