Baldwin v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
Filing
119
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/9/14 ORDERING that the parties shall meet and confer to discuss whether they will consent to trial before a magistrate judge and shall inform the court of any consent no later than 9/15/2014. Motions in limine are due 9/22/2014, with oppositions due 9/29/2014. Motions in limine will be decided before jury selection on the first day of trial. The parties shall exhaust the possibility of settlement and report any settlement to the court no later than 9/15/2014. Jury trial is set for 10/6/2014 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 3, before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Trial is anticipated to last two to three days. Each party is granted 14 days from the date of this order to file objections to the same. If no objections are filed, the order will become final without further order of this court. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
GREGORY BALDWIN,
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
14
15
Civ. No. 2:09-cv-00711 KJM AC
ORDER
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
On September 4, 2014 the court conducted a final pretrial conference. Rachael Smith and
18
19
Randall Haimovici appeared for plaintiff Gregory Baldwin; Diana Esquivel appeared for the
20
defendants.
After hearing the parties’ presentations, and good cause appearing, the court makes the
21
22
following findings and orders:
23
JURISDICTION/VENUE
Jurisdiction is predicated on 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Jurisdiction and venue are not contested.
24
25
TRIAL BEFORE A MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The parties shall meet and confer to discuss whether they will consent to trial before a
26
27
magistrate judge and shall inform the court of any consent no later than September 15, 2014.
28
/////
1
1
JURY/NON-JURY
2
3
The parties have timely requested a jury trial, and the jury shall consist of 8 jurors.
UNDISPUTED FACTS
4
5
1. Plaintiff Gregory Baldwin is a prisoner in the custody of the California Department of
Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR).
6
2. At the relevant time periods, defendant Barton was a Sergeant and defendants Fannon
7
and Gray were Correctional Officers at High Desert State Prison (HDSP) in Susanville,
8
California; they were acting under color of state law.
9
3. On January 24, 2008, Baldwin was transferred to HDSP.
10
11
12
13
4. When Baldwin was transferred, he was approved to be housed in the gym rather than in
a cell.
5. On February 29, 2008, Fannon and Gray were housing officers in Building 5 on
Facility B at HDSP, where Baldwin was housed.
14
6. On February 29, 2008, Fannon told Baldwin that he was being moved to the gym.
15
7. Baldwin said he was not going to the gym.
16
8. Fannon told Baldwin to pack up his belongings; Baldwin complied with this order.
17
9. About thirty minutes later, Fannon and Gray came to Baldwin’s cell, put him in waist
18
restraints and escorted him to the Program Office so he could talk to a Sergeant about his housing
19
assignment.
20
10. During this escort Baldwin was wearing a soft cervical neck brace.
21
11. Barton was in the Facility B gym on February 29, 2008, supervising the placement of
22
inmates.
23
12. Barton met with Baldwin in the program office.
24
13. As a Sergeant, Barton did not have the authority to make or change housing
25
26
27
28
assignments.
14. Correctional officers did not have the authority to make or change housing
assignments.
15. A classification committee decides where an inmate will be housed.
2
1
16. Before Barton’s interaction with Baldwin in the Program Office on February 29,
2
2008, Barton did not know Baldwin and was unaware of any injury or medical condition Baldwin
3
had.
4
17. Barton told Fannon and Gray to escort Baldwin to the gym.
5
18. During the escort to the gym, Fannon and Gray walked on either side of Baldwin,
6
holding Baldwin’s bicep area.
7
19. Baldwin was still wearing his soft cervical neck brace.
8
20. Barton followed behind the escort.
9
21. As they neared the entrance to the gym, Baldwin stopped walking and said he was not
10
going into the gym.
11
22. Fannon and Gray put Baldwin against the wall outside of the gym.
12
23. After a few minutes, Fannon and Gray took Baldwin into the gym.
13
24. Gray and Fannon released Baldwin, and Gray removed Baldwin’s restraints.
14
25. Baldwin said he needed medical assistance.
15
26. Medical staff came to the gym and attended to Baldwin.
16
27. Baldwin was placed on a backboard and gurney and taken to the medical unit on the
17
yard and later to the prison hospital for examination.
18
28. Baldwin had no further interaction with Barton, Fannon or Gray after he was taken
19
out of the gym on February 29, 2008.
20
DISPUTED FACTUAL ISSUES
21
1. Considering all the circumstances, did Fannon and Gray use reasonable and necessary
22
force when they put Baldwin against the wall outside and later inside the gym on February 29,
23
2008?
24
25
2. Did Barton fail to protect Baldwin from Fannon’s and Gray’s use of force on February
29, 2008?
26
3. Did defendants’ conduct on February 29, 2008 aggravate or exacerbate any pre-existing
27
injury of plaintiff’s?
28
/////
3
1
2
3
4
SPECIAL FACTUAL INFORMATION
None applicable.
DISPUTED EVIDENTIARY ISSUES
The parties have listed several disputed evidentiary issues. Motions in limine are due
5
September 22, with oppositions due September 29. Motions in limine will be decided before
6
jury selection on the first day of trial.
7
STIPULATIONS/AGREED STATEMENTS
8
The parties stipulate to the authenticity of plaintiff’s records from his central and medical
9
files, absent a dispute about when a record was created or whether it was altered. The parties also
10
stipulate to the authenticity of medical records produced via subpoena. The parties may object to
11
the admissibility of these records on other grounds.
12
13
14
They do not believe a trial on agreed statements is appropriate.
RELIEF SOUGHT
Plaintiff seeks compensatory and punitive damages. Defendants seek judgment in their
15
favor and costs.
16
POINTS OF LAW
17
The parties shall alert the court to disputes about the applicable law and legal standards.
18
Trial briefs addressing these points more completely shall be filed with this court no later than
19
seven days prior to the date of trial in accordance with Local Rule 285.
20
ABANDONED ISSUES
21
None.
22
WITNESSES
23
Plaintiff may call the following witnesses:
24
Gregory Baldwin
25
Robert Barton
26
Michael Gray
27
James Fannon
28
Dr. Jan Mensink
4
1
Dr. Manprit Dhillon
2
Nurse J. Daniels
3
Nurse R. Shaw
4
Correctional Officer David Hurd
5
Correctional Officer D. Burch
6
Correctional Officer M. Barnes
7
Correctional Lieutenant D. Dharlingue
8
Correctional Sergeant T. Hays
9
Correctional Sergeant K. Bond
10
Defendants may call the following witnesses:
11
Gregory Baldwin
12
Robert Barton
13
James Fannon
14
Michael Gray
15
Correctional Officer David Hurd
16
Correctional Officer D. Burch
17
Correctional Officer M. Barnes
18
Nurse J. Daniels
19
Nurse R. Shaw
20
Correctional Lieutenant D. Dharlingue
21
Correctional Officer C. Hougland
22
Correctional Lieutenant D. Spangle
23
Dr. Rogelio Ortega
24
Custodian of Records for plaintiff’s central file and medical records.
25
Each party may call any witnesses designated by the other.
26
/////
27
/////
28
/////
5
1
A.
The court will not permit any other witness to testify unless:
2
(1) The party offering the witness demonstrates that the witness is for the purpose
3
of rebutting evidence that could not be reasonably anticipated at the pretrial
4
conference, or
5
(2) The witness was discovered after the pretrial conference and the proffering
6
party makes the showing required in “B,” below.
7
B.
Upon the post pretrial discovery of any witness a party wishes to present at trial,
8
the party shall promptly inform the court and opposing parties of the existence of the unlisted
9
witnesses so the court may consider whether the witnesses shall be permitted to testify at trial.
10
The witnesses will not be permitted unless:
11
(1) The witness could not reasonably have been discovered prior to the
12
discovery cutoff;
13
(2) The court and opposing parties were promptly notified upon discovery
14
of the witness;
15
(3) If time permitted, the party proffered the witness for deposition; and
16
(4) If time did not permit, a reasonable summary of the witness’s testimony
17
was provided to opposing parties.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
EXHIBITS, SCHEDULES AND SUMMARIES
Plaintiff’s exhibits are identified on attachment A. At trial, plaintiff’s exhibits shall be
listed numerically.
Defendant’s exhibits are identified on attachment B. At trial, defendant’s exhibits shall
be listed alphabetically.
The court encourages the parties to generate a joint exhibit list to the extent possible.
Joint Exhibits shall be identified as JX and listed numerically, e.g., JX-1, JX-2.
25
All exhibits must be premarked.
26
The parties must prepare exhibit binders for use by the court at trial, with a side tab
27
identifying each exhibit in accordance with the specifications above. Each binder shall have an
28
identification label on the front and spine.
6
1
2
3
4
The parties must exchange exhibits no later than twenty-eight days before trial. Any
objections to exhibits are due no later than fourteen days before trial.
A. The court will not admit exhibits other than those identified on the exhibit lists
referenced above unless:
5
1. The party proffering the exhibit demonstrates that the exhibit is for the purpose
6
of rebutting evidence that could not have been reasonably anticipated, or
7
2. The exhibit was discovered after the issuance of this order and the proffering
8
party makes the showing required in Paragraph “B,” below.
9
B. Upon the discovery of exhibits after the discovery cutoff, a party shall promptly
10
inform the court and opposing parties of the existence of such exhibits so that the court may
11
consider their admissibility at trial. The exhibits will not be received unless the proffering party
12
demonstrates:
13
1. The exhibits could not reasonably have been discovered earlier;
14
2. The court and the opposing parties were promptly informed of their existence;
15
3. The proffering party forwarded a copy of the exhibits (if physically possible) to
16
the opposing party. If the exhibits may not be copied the proffering party must
17
show that it has made the exhibits reasonably available for inspection by the
18
opposing parties.
19
DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPTS
20
Counsel must lodge the sealed original copy of any deposition transcript to be used at trial
21
with the Clerk of the Court no later than fourteen days before trial.
22
FURTHER DISCOVERY OR MOTIONS
23
None anticipated.
24
AMENDMENTS/DISMISSALS
25
None anticipated.
26
27
28
SETTLEMENT
The parties have engaged in informal settlement discussions and will inform the court if
they believe a court-convened settlement conference would be helpful. The parties shall exhaust
7
1
the possibility of settlement and report any settlement to the court no later than September 15,
2
2014.
3
MOTIONS IN LIMINE
4
As noted above, motions in limine will be decided the first day of trial.
5
As the court advised the parties, it is this court’s practice to admit the fact and date of a
6
felony conviction. Other facts about the felony, including the name and nature of the crime of
7
conviction and the sentence length, are unfairly prejudicial. These facts are inadmissible unless
8
the proponent establishes that, in the circumstances of this case, specific facts about the
9
conviction are relevant to show dishonesty or undermine credibility and their admission would
10
not be unfairly prejudicial.
11
The parties advised the court at the final pretrial conference that they have made
12
stipulations as to other matters of evidence. The parties should file any stipulations as soon as
13
possible.
14
JOINT STATEMENT OF THE CASE
15
The parties shall prepare a joint statement of the case to be read to the jury and file it
16
seven days before trial.
17
SEPARATE TRIAL OF ISSUES
18
19
Defendant seeks bifurcation of the question of punitive damages.
IMPARTIAL EXPERTS/LIMITATION OF EXPERTS
20
21
Not applicable.
ATTORNEYS' FEES
22
23
The parties do not anticipate seeking attorneys’ fees.
ESTIMATED TIME OF TRIAL/TRIAL DATE
24
Jury trial is set for October 6, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. Trial is anticipated to last two to three
25
days. The parties are directed to Judge Mueller’s trial schedule outlined at the “important
26
information” link located on her web page on the court’s website.
27
/////
28
/////
8
1
2
3
4
PROPOSED JURY VOIR DIRE AND PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS
The parties shall file any proposed jury voir dire seven days before trial. Each party will
be limited to ten minutes of jury voir dire.
The court directs counsel to meet and confer in an attempt to generate a joint set of jury
5
instructions and verdicts. The parties shall file any such joint set of instructions fourteen days
6
before trial, identified as “Jury Instructions and Verdicts Without Objection.” To the extent the
7
parties are unable to agree on all or some instructions and verdicts, their respective proposed
8
instructions are due fourteen days before trial.
9
Counsel shall e-mail a copy of all proposed jury instructions and verdicts, whether agreed
10
or disputed, as a word document to kjmorders@caed.uscourts.gov no later than fourteen days
11
before trial; all blanks in form instructions should be completed and all brackets removed.
12
Objections to proposed jury instructions must be filed seven days before trial; each
13
objection shall identify the challenged instruction and shall provide a concise explanation of the
14
basis for the objection along with citation of authority. When applicable, the objecting party
15
shall submit an alternative proposed instruction on the issue or identify which of his or her own
16
proposed instructions covers the subject.
17
MISCELLANEOUS
18
19
20
Trial briefs are due seven days before trial.
OBJECTIONS TO PRETRIAL ORDER
Each party is granted fourteen days from the date of this order to file objections to the
21
same. If no objections are filed, the order will become final without further order of this court.
22
DATED: September 9, 2014.
23
24
25
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
26
27
28
9
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?