Hughey et al v. Wells Fargo & Co. et al

Filing 43

ORDER ADOPTING 24 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 07/07/09 and ORDERING that 22 plf's Motion for TRO is DENIED. (Benson, A.)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 On June 18, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. /// 1 vs. WELLS FARGO & CO., et al., Defendants. __________________________________/ ORDER 2:09-cv-0723-GEB-EFB-PS CLIFFORD D. HUGHEY II, AND LAURA M. HUGHEY, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed June 18, 2009, are ADOPTED; and 2. Plaintiffs' motion for temporary restraining order is denied. Dated: July 7, 2009

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge

2