McGee v. State of California

Filing 17

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 8/6/10 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 5/20/10 9 are ADOPTED in full; Plaintiff's MOTIONS for TRO 7 and 8 are DENIED.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

(PS) McGee v. State of California

Doc. 17

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Plaintiffs, 12 vs. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. __________________________________/ ORDER No. CIV S-09-0740 GEB EFB PS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JEFFERSON A. McGEE and PERSONS SIMILARLY SITUATED,

On May 20, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified Sch. Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. \\\\\ \\\\\ 1
Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 denied.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed May 20, 2010, are ADOPTED; and 2. Plaintiff's motions for a temporary restraining order, Dckt. Nos. 7 and 8, are

Dated: August 6, 2010

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge

2