Evon v. Law Offices of Sidney Mickell

Filing 29

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/02/09 ORDERING that: by 12/04/09, counsel for plaintiff shall inform counsel for dfs which discovery requests are being withdrawn; dfts shall provide complete responses, including production o f documents for inspection, to plf's discovery requests by 12/17/09; the hearing on the 21 Motion to Compel is CONTINUED to 01/14/10 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (GGH) before Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows if necessary; a joint statement shall be filed by 01/07/10 if necessary. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 At the request of defendants, a telephone conference was held on November 30, 2009, concerning plaintiff's motion to compel, presently calendared for hearing on December 10, 2009. John Dahlberg represented defendants. Sergei Lemberg represented plaintiff. Good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. By December 4, 2009, counsel for plaintiff shall inform counsel for defendants which discovery requests are being withdrawn. 2. Defendants shall provide complete responses, including production of documents for inspection, to plaintiff's discovery requests by December 17, 2009. 3. The December 10, 2009 hearing on the motion to compel is continued to January 14, 2010, if necessary. \\\\\ 1 vs. LAW OFFICES OF SIDNEY MICKELL, et al., Defendants. / SUMMARY ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CATHERINE EVON, Plaintiff, CIV. NO. S- 09-0760 JAM GGH 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 4. A joint statement in accordance with E.D. Local Rule 37-251 shall be filed by January 7, 2010, if necessary. DATED: December 2, 2009 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows GREGORY G. HOLLOWS U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE G G H :0 7 6 E v o n 0 7 6 0 .o r d .w p d 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?