Doe v. University of the Pacific

Filing 58

ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 6/14/2010 GRANTING 57 Request to File Documents Under Seal. (Krueger, M)

Download PDF
1 Janine S. Simerly (SBN 102361) jss@millerlawgroup.com 2 Jennifer Cotner (SBN (SBN 255785) jrc@millerlawgroup.com 3 MILLER LAW GROUP A Professional Corporation 4 111 Sutter Street, Suite 700 San Francisco, CA 94104 5 Tel.: (415) 464-4300 Fax: (415) 464-4336 6 Attorneys for Defendant 7 UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC 8 9 10 11 12 JANE DOE, 13 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No.: 2:09-CV-00764-FCD-KJM ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC'S REQUEST TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL (L.R. 141) M I L L E R LAW GROUP 14 15 v. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Plaintiff, UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC, Defendant. Hon. Frank C. Damrell, Jr. Complaint filed: March 18, 2009 Trial Date: January 11, 2011 Having reviewed Defendant's Notice of Request and Request to File Under 24 Seal (the "Motion") and good cause appearing therefore, the Court orders as follows: 25 Defendant's Motion is hereby GRANTED. 26 Defendant's Reply Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of 27 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary 28 Judgment, and all supporting pleadings and evidence, may be filed under seal. The Clerk 1 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S REQUEST TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL Case No.: 2:09-CV-00764-FCD-KJM 1 shall maintain these documents pursuant to Local Rule 141(e). 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 14, 2010 FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE M I L L E R LAW GROUP 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S REQUEST TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL Case No.: 2:09-CV-00764-FCD-KJM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?