Doe v. University of the Pacific

Filing 88

ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 11/12/2010 GRANTING 87 Request to Seal Document. (Krueger, M)

Download PDF
Doe v. University of the Pacific Doc. 88 1 Janine S. Simerly (SBN 102361) jss@millerlawgroup.com 2 Joseph P. Mascovich (SBN 103167) jpm@millerlawgroup.com 3 Jennifer Cotner (SBN (SBN 255785) jrc@millerlawgroup.com 4 MILLER LAW GROUP A Professional Corporation 5 111 Sutter Street, Suite 700 San Francisco, CA 94104 6 Tel.: (415) 464-4300 Fax: (415) 464-4336 7 Attorneys for Defendant 8 UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC 9 10 11 12 13 JANE DOE, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No.: 2:09-CV-00764-FCD-KJM ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC'S REQUEST TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL (L.R. 141) Hon. Frank C. Damrell, Jr. Complaint filed: March 18, 2009 Trial Date: January 11, 2011 M I L L E R LAW GROUP 14 15 16 v. 17 18 19 20 21 22 UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC, Defendant. Plaintiff, Having reviewed Defendant's Notice of Request and Request to Seal 23 Documents (the "Motion") and good cause appearing therefore, the Court orders as follows: 24 Defendant's Motion is hereby GRANTED. 25 26 Defendant University of the Pacific's Reply Memorandum of Points and 27 Authorities in Support of Motion for Award of Attorney Fees and Sanctions may be filed 28 under seal. The Clerk shall maintain these documents pursuant to Local Rule 39-141(e). 1 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S REQUEST TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL (L.R. 141) ­ Case No.: 2:09-CV-00764-FCD-KJM Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 12, 2010 FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE M I L L E R LAW GROUP 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S REQUEST TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL (L.R. 141) ­ Case No.: 2:09-CV-00764-FCD-KJM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?