Pinasco et al v. State of CA et al

Filing 24

STIPULATION and ORDER 23 signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/24/11 ORDERING that the plaintiffs shall have up to and including 6/30/11 to oppose defendants' dispositive motion and that defendants shall have up to and including 714/11 to reply to plaintiffs' opposition. (Matson, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6

MAXWELL M. FREEMAN, #31278
ARNOLD J. WOLF, #119135
MICHAEL N. MORLAN, #126190
FREEMAN, D’AIUTO, PIERCE,
GUREV, KEELING & WOLF
A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION
1818 Grand Canal Boulevard, Suite 4
Stockton, California 95207
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

7
8

Attorneys for plaintiffs Joe and Toni Pinasco,
individually and as beneficiaries and successors
in interest of the Estate of Joseph Pinasco, Jr.

9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13

JOSEPH and TONI PINASCO, individually;
and ESTATE OF JOSEPH PINASCO, JR., by
and through Joseph and Toni Pinasco as
beneficiaries of the estate and successors in
interest; and

14
Plaintiffs,
15
vs.
16
17

STATE OF CALIFORNIA; CALIFORNIA
HIGHWAY PATROL; M. WALLING; S.
COFFMAN; and DOES 1 thru 50, inclusive,

18
19

Defendants.
______________________________________

20

1.

CASE NO. 2:09 CV-00777 KJM CMK
STIPULATION TO MODIFY
SCHEDULING ORDER; ORDER

Complaint filed February 27, 2009
Trial Date: 1/9/12

WHEREAS:

21

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

The Pretrial Scheduling Order filed on February 3, 2010, provided that defendants’

22

dispositive motion shall be filed by June 9, 2011, that plaintiffs’ opposition shall be filed by June 23,

23

2011, and that defendants’ reply shall be filed by July 7, 2011, and that hearing on such motion shall be

24

on July 14, 2011;

25

2.

26
27

The Pretrial Scheduling Order was modified on March 10, 2011, to provide that the

hearing on the dispositive motions shall be set for July 20, 2011;
3.

Plaintiffs require more than two weeks to respond to defendants’ dispositive motion,

28
1
Stipulation to Modify Scheduling Order;

Order

1

especially since plaintiffs’ counsel is scheduled to begin a trial on June 13, 2011 in El Dorado County.

2

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, subject to the court’s approval, that

3

the plaintiffs shall have up to and including June 30, 2011 to oppose defendants’ dispositive motion and

4

that defendants shall have up to and including July 14, 2011, to reply to plaintiffs’ opposition.

5
6

Dated: May 16, 2011

7
8
9
10
Dated: May 16, 2011
11
12
13

TÜÇÉÄw ]A jÉÄy
_____________________________________
ARNOLD J. WOLF
Attorneys for plaintiffs Joe and Toni Pinasco,
individually and as beneficiaries and successors in
interest of the Estate of Joseph Pinasco, Jr.
cxàxÜ TA `xá{Éà
_________________________________________
PETER A. MESHOT
Attorney for defendants State of California, by and
through California Highway Patrol, M. Walling
and S. Coffman

14
15
16

This court will hear dispositive motions no later than July 27, 2011. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 24, 2011.

17
18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Stipulation to Modify Scheduling Order;

Order