Xavier v. Roche et al

Filing 18

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/1/2010 ORDERING that this case is REFERRED to the prisoner civil rights pro bono panel administrator for appointment of counsel; the clerk to send a copy of this order on Sujean Park; pltf will be informed as soon as counsel is appointed. (cc: Sujean Park)(Yin, K)

Download PDF
(PC) Xavier v. Roche et al Doc. 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. S.M. ROCHE, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Upon review of the documents on file and good cause appearing therefor, the court finds as follows: 1. Efforts to obtain legal representation for plaintiff without order of this court would be futile; 2. Plaintiff's income is 125 percent or less of the current poverty threshold established by the Office of Management and Budget of the United States and plaintiff is otherwise without resources to obtain counsel; 3. This case is of a type that attorneys in this district ordinarily do not accept without prepayment of a fee; ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GARY RAYMOND XAVIER, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-0783 LKK KJM P ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 xavi0783.atty 4. This case is not a fee generating case within the meaning of California Business and Professions Code § 8030.4(g); and 5. This case has sufficient merit to warrant appointment of counsel as provided by this court's General Order No. 230. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. This case is referred to the prisoner civil rights pro bono panel administrator, Sujean Park, for appointment of counsel. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on Sujean Park. 2. Plaintiff will be informed as soon as counsel is appointed. DATED: November 1, 2010. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?