Xavier v. Roche et al
Filing
42
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/18/12 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
GARY R. XAVIER,
11
12
13
Plaintiff,
No. 2:09-cv-0783 LKK CKD P
vs.
M. FRENCH, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS
/
16
By order filed November 8, 2012, plaintiff was ordered to show cause, within
17
thirty days, why his claims against defendants French and Holland should not be dismissed for
18
failure to execute service. (Dkt. No. 41.) The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff
19
has not shown cause or otherwise responded to the court’s order. As no other defendants remain
20
in this action (see Dkt. No. 29), the court will recommend that this action be dismissed in its
21
entirety.
22
23
24
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District
25
Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen
26
days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written
1
objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's
2
Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the
3
specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951
4
F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
5
Dated: December 18, 2012
6
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
2
xavi0783.Fsc
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?