Cottrell v. Wright et al

Filing 41

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 06/14/11 ordering defendants shall file a response to the document filed with the court by plaintiff on 06/02/11 within 14 days. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL M. COTTRELL, 11 12 13 Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-0824 JAM DAD (TEMP) P vs. M. WRIGHT, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff filed a document on June 2, 2011, in which he suggests that defendants 17 have not served timely responses to plaintiff’s requests for discovery. Good cause appearing, 18 defendants shall file a response to the document filed with the court by plaintiff on June 2, 2011, 19 within fourteen days. 20 DATED: June 14, 2011. 21 22 23 24 25 26 DAD:kc cott0824.dis

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?