Carr v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
Filing
141
ORDER granting 140 Motion for Reconsideration signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/8/11: On or before August 29, 2011, plaintiff shall file his opposition to defendants' motions to strike; defendants' reply, if any, shall be filed seven days thereafter. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
ARTHUR CARR,
11
12
13
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
No. 2:09-cv-0826 GEB KJN P
Defendants.
ORDER
vs.
H. HER, et al.,
/
On August 5, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of this court’s July
17
26, 2011 order denying plaintiff’s motions for extensions of time to file a surreply. Plaintiff
18
argues that he mistakenly believed that a surreply was an appropriate response to defendants’
19
June 6, 2011 motion to strike. Plaintiff asks the court to grant plaintiff leave to file a proper
20
opposition to defendants’ motion to strike.
21
Review of defendants’ June 6, 2011 reply reflects that defendants included
22
motions to strike plaintiff’s evidence to which defendants raised an objection (dkt. no. 121-1-2.)
23
Thus, plaintiff is granted an opportunity to oppose defendants’ motions to strike. Fed. R. Civ. P.
24
60(b). Plaintiff is cautioned that his filing is limited to the evidence to which defendants raised
25
an objection. No additional filings in connection with the motion for summary judgment are
26
permitted. The court is not inclined to grant additional extensions of time.
1
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. Plaintiff’s August 5, 2011 motion (dkt. no. 140) is granted;
3
2. On or before August 29, 2011, plaintiff shall file his opposition to defendants’
4
motions to strike; defendants’ reply, if any, shall be filed seven days thereafter.
5
DATED: August 8, 2011
6
7
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
carr0826.rec
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?