Carr v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al

Filing 211

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/12/2013 DENYING plaintiff's 209 request; and plaintiff is RELIEVED of his obligation to bring a copy of the photographs he intends to submit at trial. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARTHUR CARR, 11 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, No. 2:09-cv-0826 GEB KJN P Defendants. ORDER vs. H. HER, et al., / On February 1, 2013, plaintiff filed a request for return of photographs submitted 17 with his pretrial statement. Plaintiff states he needs the photographs so that he can provide 18 defendants with copies of missing photographs and make copies of the photographs for use at 19 trial. On August 7, 2012, plaintiff submitted original photographs, including some in color, for 20 consideration with his pretrial statement. (Dkt. No. 195 at 25-55.) The photographs were 21 scanned into CM/ECF, and the originals were maintained in the court file. Defendants have 22 access to view these photographs through CM/ECF, and initially provided the photographs to 23 plaintiff responsive to a request for production of documents. (Dkt. No. 195 at 22-55.) 24 Therefore, it is not necessary for plaintiff to provide defendants with a copy of the photographs, 25 or to bring an additional set of copies of the photographs to trial. Plaintiff is relieved of his 26 obligation to provide a copy of the photographs at trial. 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HERE ORDERED that: 2 1. Plaintiff’s February 1, 2013 request (dkt. no. 209) is denied; and 3 2. Plaintiff is relieved of his obligation to bring a copy of the photographs he 4 intends to submit at trial. 5 DATED: February 12, 2013 6 7 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 carr0926.photos 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?