Tandel v. County of Sacramento, et al.

Filing 48

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 3/7/11 ORDERING the parties' Stipulated Proctective Order is GRANTED with the following modifications: the substantive standards set forth by the Ninth Circuit for filing documents under sea l are found in Pintos v. Pacific Creditors Assn., 605 F.3d 665, 678 (9th Cir. 2010) and Phillips v. General Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210 (9th Cir. 2002). Procedurally, the parties must comply with E. D. Local Rules 141 and 141.1 regarding the sealing of documents. Any confidential material filed with the court, sealed or otherwise, will not be returned at the conclusion of the litigation. (Carlos, K)

-GGH Tandel v. County of Sacramento, et al.

Doc. 48

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. / This court has considered the Parties' Proposed Stipulated Protective Order filed March 3, 2011. GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Parties' Stipulated Protective Order is GRANTED with the following modifications. The substantive standards set forth by the Ninth Circuit for filing documents under seal are found in Pintos v. Pacific Creditors Ass'n., 605 F.3d 665, 678 (9th Cir. 2010) and Phillips v. General Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210 (9th Cir. 2002). Procedurally, the parties must comply with E. D. Local Rules 141 and 141.1 regarding the sealing of documents. \\\\\ \\\\\ \\\\\ 1
Dockets.Justia.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SANDIPKUMAR TANDEL, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-0842 MCE GGH

ORDER

1 2 3 4 5 6
GGH:076

Any confidential material filed with the court, sealed or otherwise, will not be returned at the conclusion of the litigation. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: March 7, 2011 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Tandel842.po.wpd

7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

2