Tandel v. County of Sacramento, et al.
Filing
67
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/20/11 ORDERING that Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the First Amended Complaint is GRANTED. Plaintiff may file a Second Amended Complaint Naming Doe Defendants in Case No. 2:09-CV-842, within twenty (20) days of this Order being electronically filed. The hearing, scheduled for June 23, 2011 before this Court, is hereby VACATED. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SANDIPKUMAR TANDEL,
Lead Case No.:
2:11-CV-353-MCE-GGH
Plaintiffs,
12
13
v.
14
15
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO et al,
Defendants.
16
17
SANDIPKUMAR TANDEL,
18
Plaintiffs,
19
v.
20
21
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO et al,
22
23
24 ///
25 ///
26 ///
27 ///
28 ///
Defendants.
Consolidated with:
2:09-CV-842-MCE-GGH
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT NAMING DOE DEFENDANTS IN
CASE 2:09-CV-842-MCE-GGH
1
2
Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend the First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 36) is GRANTED.
Plaintiff may file a Second Amended Complaint Naming Doe Defendants in Case No. 2:09-CV-
3 842, within twenty (20) days of this Order being electronically filed. The hearing, scheduled for
4 June 23, 2011 before this Court, is hereby VACATED.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7 Date: June 20, 2011
8
9
__________________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
DEAC_Signature-END:
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
c4d6b0d3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?