Tandel v. County of Sacramento, et al.

Filing 67

ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/20/11 ORDERING that Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the First Amended Complaint is GRANTED. Plaintiff may file a Second Amended Complaint Naming Doe Defendants in Case No. 2:09-CV-842, within twenty (20) days of this Order being electronically filed. The hearing, scheduled for June 23, 2011 before this Court, is hereby VACATED. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SANDIPKUMAR TANDEL, Lead Case No.: 2:11-CV-353-MCE-GGH Plaintiffs, 12 13 v. 14 15 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO et al, Defendants. 16 17 SANDIPKUMAR TANDEL, 18 Plaintiffs, 19 v. 20 21 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO et al, 22 23 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// Defendants. Consolidated with: 2:09-CV-842-MCE-GGH ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT NAMING DOE DEFENDANTS IN CASE 2:09-CV-842-MCE-GGH 1 2 Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend the First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 36) is GRANTED. Plaintiff may file a Second Amended Complaint Naming Doe Defendants in Case No. 2:09-CV- 3 842, within twenty (20) days of this Order being electronically filed. The hearing, scheduled for 4 June 23, 2011 before this Court, is hereby VACATED. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Date: June 20, 2011 8 9 __________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 DEAC_Signature-END: 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 c4d6b0d3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?