Scott v. McDonald

Filing 142

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/12/14 ORDERING that plaintiffs objections, construed as a motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 141 ) is denied. (Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HOWARD SCOTT, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:09-cv-0851-MCE-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER M. McDONALD, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 21, 2014, the court denied plaintiff’s request for appointment of 19 counsel. ECF No. 137. The court also construed plaintiff’s motion, entitled “Motion for 20 Summary Judgment and Motion for Request for Appointment of Counsel as well as Opposing 21 Attorney General Motion to Dismiss,” as a motion to compel, and denied that motion as well. 22 See id. (explaining that given the July 29, 2013 deadline for filing motions to compel, plaintiff’s 23 February 7, 2014 motion was not timely filed). Plaintiff has filed “objections” to the March 21, 24 2014 order, which the court construes as a motion for reconsideration. See ECF No. 132 at 2, 3 25 (objecting to portion of order denying counsel and requesting that the court “revisit” its ruling on 26 the “summary judgment” motion). 27 28 Local Rule 230(j) requires that a motion for reconsideration state “what new or different facts or circumstances are claimed to exist which did not exist or were not shown upon such prior 1 1 motion,” and “why the facts or circumstances were not shown at the time of the prior motion.” 2 E.D. Cal., Local Rule 230(j)(3)-(4). 3 4 5 Plaintiff’s motion must be denied because it does not describe new or different facts that plaintiff could not have shown with his prior motion. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s “objections,” construed as a 6 motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 141) is denied. 7 DATED: May 12, 2014. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?