Scott v. McDonald
Filing
169
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/17/15 ORDERING that because the settlement negotiations may moot the summary judgment motions altogether, the court will deny them (ECF Nos. 145 , 164 ) without prejudice to renewal within seven days of the April 7, 2015 settlement conference.(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
HOWARD SCOTT,
11
12
13
14
No. 2:09-cv-0851-MCE-EFB P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
M. McDONALD, et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
17
Defendants’ motions for summary judgment are pending but not yet submitted for decision. ECF
18
Nos. 145, 164. The court stayed plaintiff’s obligation to respond to the motions pending
19
appointment of counsel for plaintiff. ECF No. 150. The court subsequently appointed counsel,
20
but only for the limited purpose of assisting plaintiff with settlement negotiations, currently
21
scheduled for April 7, 2015. ECF Nos. 166-168. Thus, plaintiff’s oppositions to the motions are
22
not yet due. Because the settlement negotiations may moot the summary judgment motions
23
altogether, the court will deny them (ECF Nos. 145, 164) without prejudice to renewal within
24
seven days of the April 7, 2015 settlement conference. If appropriate, the court will then issue a
25
new schedule for briefing on the motions.
26
So Ordered.
27
DATED: March 17, 2015.
28
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?