Scott v. McDonald
Filing
173
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 4/9/15 ORDERING that Defendant D. MEDINA is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule 27 of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) with the parties mentioned herein to bear their own fees and costs. (Becknal, R)
1
RIVERA & ASSOCIATES
2
2180 Harvard Street, Suite 310
Sacramento, California 95815
3
Tel: 916-922-1200 Fax: 916 922-1303
4
Jesse M. Rivera, SBN 84259
Jonathan B. Paul, SBN 215884
Shanan L. Hewitt, SBN 200168
Jill B. Nathan, SBN 186136
Jamil R. Ghannam, SBN 300730
5
6
7
Attorneys for Defendant,
D. MEDINA
8
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
HOWARD SCOTT,
12
Plaintiff,
13
)
)
)
)
)
14
15
vs.
16
17
18
M. McDONALD, et al.,
Defendants.
CASE NO. 2:09-CV-00851 MCE-EFB P
STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE FOR DEFENDANT
D. MEDINA [FRCP 41(a)(1)]; ORDER
THEREON
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
19
20
It is hereby stipulated, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
21
by and between Plaintiff HOWARD SCOTT, by and through his attorney, Andrew Peter Rausch,
22
Jr., and Defendant D. MEDINA, by and through his attorney, Shanan L. Hewitt, that Defendant
23
D. MEDINA is dismissed from this action with prejudice.
24
In consideration of the Stipulation entered by the above-named parties to the United States
25
District Court Eastern District of California action, Scott v. McDonald, et al, Case No. 2:09-CV-
26
00851 MCE-EFB P, Defendant D. MEDINA is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule
27
of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) with the parties mentioned herein to bear their own fees and costs.
28
1
2
Date: April 7, 2015
/s/ Andrew Peter Rausch, Jr.
ANDREW PETER RAUSCH, JR.
Attorney for PLAINTIFF HOWARD SCOTT
Date: : April 7, 2015
/s/ Shanan L. Hewitt
SHANAN L. HEWITT
Attorney for DEFENDANT D. MEDINA
3
/s/
4
5
6
7
7
8
9
10
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 9, 2015
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?