Scott v. McDonald

Filing 173

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 4/9/15 ORDERING that Defendant D. MEDINA is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule 27 of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) with the parties mentioned herein to bear their own fees and costs. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 RIVERA & ASSOCIATES 2 2180 Harvard Street, Suite 310 Sacramento, California 95815 3 Tel: 916-922-1200 Fax: 916 922-1303 4 Jesse M. Rivera, SBN 84259 Jonathan B. Paul, SBN 215884 Shanan L. Hewitt, SBN 200168 Jill B. Nathan, SBN 186136 Jamil R. Ghannam, SBN 300730 5 6 7 Attorneys for Defendant, D. MEDINA 8 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 HOWARD SCOTT, 12 Plaintiff, 13 ) ) ) ) ) 14 15 vs. 16 17 18 M. McDONALD, et al., Defendants. CASE NO. 2:09-CV-00851 MCE-EFB P STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE FOR DEFENDANT D. MEDINA [FRCP 41(a)(1)]; ORDER THEREON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 19 20 It is hereby stipulated, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 21 by and between Plaintiff HOWARD SCOTT, by and through his attorney, Andrew Peter Rausch, 22 Jr., and Defendant D. MEDINA, by and through his attorney, Shanan L. Hewitt, that Defendant 23 D. MEDINA is dismissed from this action with prejudice. 24 In consideration of the Stipulation entered by the above-named parties to the United States 25 District Court Eastern District of California action, Scott v. McDonald, et al, Case No. 2:09-CV- 26 00851 MCE-EFB P, Defendant D. MEDINA is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule 27 of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) with the parties mentioned herein to bear their own fees and costs. 28 1 2 Date: April 7, 2015 /s/ Andrew Peter Rausch, Jr. ANDREW PETER RAUSCH, JR. Attorney for PLAINTIFF HOWARD SCOTT Date: : April 7, 2015 /s/ Shanan L. Hewitt SHANAN L. HEWITT Attorney for DEFENDANT D. MEDINA 3 /s/ 4 5 6 7 7 8 9 10 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 9, 2015

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?