Bartholomew v. Sisto et al

Filing 23

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/17/10 ORDERING that the 4/27/10 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 18 are ADOPTED in full; Defendants D.K. Sisto; E.V. Elisara and J.A. La are DISMISSED from this Action; and This Action will proceed as against the remaining defendants. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. D.K. SISTO, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules. On April 27, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within a specified time. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge's analysis. /// 1 KEVIN BARTHOLOMEW, Plaintiff, ORDER No. CIV S-09-0882-JAM-CMK-P IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 full; Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed April 27, 2010, are adopted in 2. 3. Defendants Sisto, Elisara and La are dismissed form this action; and This action will proceed as against the remaining defendants. DATED: June 17, 2010 /s/ John A. Mendez U. S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?