Glover v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 23

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 05/05/10 ORDERING that plf shall show cause in writing w/i 14 days why this action should not be dismissed for failure to file a dispositive motion. Plaintiff is again warned that failure to respond to this order may result in dismissal of the action for the reasons outlined above, as well as for failure to prosecute and comply with court rules and orders. (Benson, A.)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 / Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this action for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Pursuant to the court's scheduling order, plaintiff was required to prosecute this action by either seeking voluntary remand or filing a dispositive motion within 45 days from the date of service of the administrative record by defendant. Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply may result in dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. See Local Rule 110. A review of the docket reflects that the answer and certified administrative record were served on September 11, 2009. Plaintiff obtained four stipulations, which were approved by the court, extending the time in which she was to file her dispositive motion up to and 1 vs. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, CHARLOTTE GLOVER, Plaintiff, ORDER No. CIV S-09-0898-CMK IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

including April 9, 2010. In approving the fourth extension, the court cautioned Plaintiff that further extensions were discouraged and would be denied unless good cause was shown. To date, plaintiff has not filed a dispositive motion. Plaintiff shall show cause in writing, within 14 days of the date of this order, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to file a dispositive motion. Plaintiff is again warned that failure to respond to this order may result in dismissal of the action for the reasons outlined above, as well as for failure to prosecute and comply with court rules and orders. See id. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: May 5, 2010 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2