Team One Networking v. Eatmon et al

Filing 60

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 5/3/2011 ORDERING that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice. The Court shall retain retain jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing the terms of the Settlement Agreement. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3

Randall C. Nelson, State Bar No. 138298
CARR, KENNEDY, PETERSON & FROST
A Law Corporation
420 Redcliff Drive
Redding, California 96002
[phone]; FAX [phone]

4
5
6

Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants
Jason Eatmon, individually and d/b/a KDJ Enterprises,
a general partnership; Dan Lockwood, individually and
d/b/a KDJ Enterprises, a general partnership; and
Defendant Development Group, Inc., a California corporation

7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

TEAM ONE NETWORKING, a California
Corporation;

)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
JASON EATMON, individually and d/b/a
)
KDJ Enterprises, a general partnership;
)
DAN LOCKWOOD, individually and d/b/a
)
KDJ Enterprises, a general partnership;
)
DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC., a
)
California corporation; and DOES 1
)
through 10, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
______________________________________ )
)
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.
)
______________________________________ )

NO. 2:09-CV-00903-WBS-DAD
STIPULATION AND ORDER
RE SETTLEMENT AND
DISMISSAL OF ACTION

The Honorable William B. Shubb

WHEREAS, Team One Networking, Inc. (“Team One”) filed an action against Jason

23

Eatmon, Dan Lockwood, Development Group, Inc. and KDJ Enterprises (collectively referred

24

to as “Defendants”) in the United States District Court, Eastern District, Case

25

No. 2:09-cv-00903 (the “Action”). Jason Eatmon and Dan Lockwood each filed Counterclaims

26

against Team One in the same Action;
1
STIPULATION & ORDER RE SETTLEMENT & DISMISSAL OF ACTION

1

WHEREAS, Team One and Defendants have reached a full and final confidential

2

settlement of the Action, the terms of which are set forth in a “Confidential Settlement

3

Agreement and Mutual Release of Claims” (“Settlement Agreement”), which has been

4

executed by the parties.

5

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that the parties agree and hereby request that the United

6

States District Court, Eastern District of California, shall retain jurisdiction over the parties to

7

enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement until there is full performance of the terms

8

thereof, which shall have occurred on or before December 31, 2013.

9

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that the entire Action shall be dismissed without

10

prejudice.

11

DATED: April 28, 2011.

PALMER KAZANJIAN WOHL HODSON, LLP

12
By /s/Christopher Wohl (as authorized on 04/28/11)
Christopher Wohl
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant

13
14
15

DATED: April 28, 2011.

CARR, KENNEDY, PETERSON & FROST

16
By /s/Robert M. Harding
Robert M. Harding
Attorneys for Defendants and
Counterclaimants

17
18
19

ORDER

20
21

IT IS SO ORDERED. The Court shall retain jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing

22

the terms of the Settlement Agreement.

23

DATED: May 3, 2011

24
25
26
2
STIPULATION & ORDER RE SETTLEMENT & DISMISSAL OF ACTION