Hubbard v. Hougland et al

Filing 137

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/12/14 ORDERING that, upon reconsideration, the 133 Order of the magistrate judge filed 3/18/14, is AFFIRMED. (Meuleman, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DARRYL HUBBARD,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:09-cv-0939 TLN AC P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

C.D. HOUGLAND, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

On April 1, 2014, Defendants filed a motion seeking partial reconsideration of the

18

magistrate judge’s order filed March 18, 2014, wherein Plaintiff’s motion to compel further

19

discovery responses was granted in part and denied in part. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a

20

magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Id. Upon

21

review of the entire file, the Court finds that it that the magistrate judge’s ruling was not clearly

22

erroneous or contrary to law.

23

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

24

magistrate judge filed March 18, 2014 (ECF No. 133), is affirmed.

25

Dated: August 12, 2014

26
27
28

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge