Bridges v. Hubbard et al

Filing 62

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 05/09/11 ordering that plaintiff's motions 58 and 59 are denied as moot. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

WILLIE BRIDGES,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13

vs.
SUZAN L. HUBBARD, et al.,

14

Defendants.

15

ORDER
/

16
17

No. CIV S-09-0940 DAD P

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Plaintiff
seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

18

Pending before the court are two motions brought by plaintiff related to service of

19

process on defendant Marquez. First, plaintiff moves the court for an order staying this action

20

until the United States Marshal serves defendant Marquez. Second, plaintiff seeks a court order

21

directing the United States Marshal to obtain the forwarding address of defendant Marquez from

22

the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

23

Plaintiff is advised that the United States Marshal executed personal service on

24

defendant Marquez on April 15, 2011. Accordingly, the court will deny plaintiff’s motions as

25

moot.

26

/////
1

1

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motions

2

(Doc. Nos. 58 & 59) are denied as moot.

3

DATED: May 9, 2011.

4
5
6

DAD:9
brid0940.moot

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2