Smith v. Tucker
Filing
53
ORDER ADOPTING 49 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. on 04/11/11 and ORDERING that dfts J. Ganal, W. Jenkins, Long, Alvarez and Borgus are DISMISSED w/o prejudice. (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
DAMEN SMITH,
Plaintiff,
11
12
vs.
13
No. CIV S-09-0993 FCD EFB P
TUCKER, et al.,
Defendants.
14
ORDER
/
15
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has filed this civil rights
16
17
action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States
18
Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On February 15, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations
19
20
herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any
21
objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days from the
22
date the findings and recommendations were served. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings
23
and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule
24
25
304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the
26
entire
1
1
file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by
2
proper analysis.
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
1. The findings and recommendations filed February 15, 2011, are adopted in
5
6
full; and
2. Defendants Alvarez, Long, Borgus, Jenkins, and Ganal are dismissed from this
7
action without prejudice.
8
So ordered.
9
DATED: April 11, 2011.
10
11
_______________________________________
FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?