Funk v. Town of Paradise et al
Filing
119
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 12/4/2013 ORDERING that the hearing re 114 Motion for New Trial is CONTINUED to 1/9/2014 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Chief Judge Morrison C. England Jr.. Defendant's Ex Parte Application to continue the hearing is DENIED as moot. (Zignago, K.)
1 DOUGLAS R. THORN (Cal. Bar No. 133521)
Law Office of Douglas R. Thorn
2 7601 Watson Way
Citrus Heights, California 95610
3 Email – drthorn@surewest.net
4
J. SCOTT SMITH (Cal. Car No. 151163)
5 Law Office of J. Scott Smith
4941 Forrestal Street
6 Fair Oaks, California 95628
Telephone (916) 952-1398
7 E-mail: jscottsmith63@gmail.com
8
Attorneys for Defendants Town of Paradise, Gerald
9 Carrigan, Robert Pickering and Timothy Cooper.
10
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
14
15
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
HARAOLD ANTHONY FUNK,
Plaintiff,
16
17
Case No.: 2:09-CV-01000-MCE-KJM
vs.
TOWN OF PARADISE, PARADISE
Order
GERALD CARRIGAN, PARADISE
The Honorable Morrison C. England
United States District Judge
18 POLICE DEPARTMENT CHIEF
19 POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICER
ROBERT PICKERING, PARADISE
20 POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICER
TIMOTHY COOPER, and DOES 1
21 through 100, inclusive,
22
Defendants.
23
24
The parties have submitted a stipulated request to continue the hearing scheduled
25 for Plaintiff’s Motion for New Trial to January 9, 2014.
26 ///
27 ///
28 ///
1
Order Continuing Hearing Date On Motion for New Trial
1 Good cause having been shown, That request is hereby GRANTED and the hearing is
2 hereby scheduled for January 9, 2014 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 7 of the above-entitled
3 court. Defendant’s ex parte application to continue the hearing is DENIED as moot.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5 Dated: December 4, 2013
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Order Continuing Hearing Date On Motion for New Trial
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?