Jones v. County of Sacramento et al

Filing 94

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 9/24/2010 GRANTING 90 Stipulation and Proposed Order to reassign case to Magistrate Judge for trial. (Matson, R)

Download PDF
Jones v. County of Sacramento et al Doc. 94 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 John A. Lavra, SBN 114533 Jeri L. Pappone, SBN 210104 Amanda L. Butts, SBN 253651 Longyear, O'Dea and Lavra, LLP 3620 American River Drive, Suite 230 Sacramento, Ca. 95864 Telephone: (916) 974-8500 Facsimile: (916) 974-8510 Attorneys for Defendants, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; JOHN MCGINNESS, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of the Sacramento County Sheriff's Department; Sacramento County Main Jail Commander ERIC MANESS; Sacramento County Sheriff's Department Chief of Correctional and Court Services JAMIE LEWIS; Sacramento Sheriff's Department Deputy CHRIS CONRAD IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION DRAKE S. JONES Plaintiff v. C OUNT Y OF SACRAMENTO; JOHN MCGINNESS, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of the Sacramento County Sheriff's Department; Sacramento County Main Jail Commander ERIC MANESS; Sacramento C o unty Sheriff's Departme n t Chief of Correctional and Court Services JAMIE LEWIS; Sacramento Sheriff's Department Deputy CHRIS CONRAD (Badge # 1202); and DOES 1- to 20, Defendants. _____________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:09-CV-01025-WBS-DAD STIPULATION AND ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR TRIAL L O N G Ye3eAh oAmerican974-8500 95864-5923 (916) 974-8510 T E 6p 0 , e (916) eeRta&LCA /V RSuite 230 l 2 R n Oa't troarm A io ,e ra Drive, A , L L P S AcD E yn v L A Facsimile n st w The parties herein, by and through their respective counsel, hereby agree and stipulate to reassign this case to the assigned Magistrate Judge as follows: WHEREAS, this matter was originally scheduled for trial on October 13, 2010; and WHEREAS, at the final pre-trial conference on August 23, 2010, this Court indicated that the trial date was not confirmed due to a criminal case that was set for trial over an extended period of time which could affect the trial date in this case; and WHEREAS, at the final pre-trial conference, the Court informed the parties that, if agreed to by all parties, the Court would reassign this case for trial to the Magistrate Judge; and Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd has secure dates available for trial of this matter in the near future. NOW THEREFORE, the parties, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate that this case be reassigned to Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd for jury trial. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: September 24, 2010 LONGYEAR, O'DEA AND LAVRA, LLP By: /s/ John L. Lavra JOHN A. LAVRA JERI L. PAPPONE AMANDA L. BUTTS Attorneys for Defendants Dated: September 24, 2010 LAW OFFICES OF STEWART KATZ By: /s/ Stewart Katz Stewart Katz Attorney for Plaintiff ORDER Based upon the stipulation of the parties, this matter is reassigned to Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd for jury trial. L O N G Ye3eAh oAmerican974-8500 95864-5923 (916) 974-8510 T E 6p 0 , e (916) eeRta&LCA /V RSuite 230 l 2 R n Oa't troarm A io ,e ra Drive, A , L L P S AcD E yn v L A Facsimile n st w IT IS SO ORDERED Dated: September 24, 2010 ///// ///// ///// S t i p u l a t i o n and Order for Reassignment of Case to Magistrate Judge for Trial P age 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 DATED: September 29, 2010. Ddad1\orders.civil\jones1025.stipord.reassign.trial L O N G Ye3eAh oAmerican974-8500 95864-5923 (916) 974-8510 T E 6p 0 , e (916) eeRta&LCA /V RSuite 230 l 2 R n Oa't troarm A io ,e ra Drive, A , L L P S AcD E yn v L A Facsimile n st w 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 S t i p u l a t i o n and Order for Reassignment of Case to Magistrate Judge for Trial P age 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?